| Author(s) |
John A. Tetnowski Anne J. Schagen |
| Volume | 25 |
| Number | 1 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Page(s) | 8-18 |
| Language | English |
| Category | |
| Keywords |
stuttering identification self-perception stutter |
| Abstract |
This study compared judgments of stuttering made by six persons who stutter (PWS) with the highly agreed upon judgments of stuttering made by eight independent listeners. Listeners’ judgments were based on at least seven of the eight judges agreeing on whether stuttering occurred or not on a given segment. Judgements of whether stuttering occurred were made immediately by the speakers as suggested by Moore and Perkins (1990). Comparisons of speakers’ judgements of stuttering to listeners’ judgements of stuttering revealed a Cohen’s Kappa of 0.276 (significant beyond the .001 level). Analysis of results shows high listener/speaker agreement on nonstuttered words (as identified by speakers), but low listener/speaker agreement on stuttered words (as identified by speakers). La présente étude compare les jugements sur le bégaiement posés par six personnes qui bégaient elles-mêmes avec ceux sur lesquels s'entendaient largement huit auditeurs indépendants. Au moins sept des huit juges devaient être d'accord sur la présence ou l'absence de bégaiement dans un segment donné pour que l'on retienne leur jugement. À la suggestion de Moore et Perkins (1990), les locuteurs ont jugé sur-le-champ s'ils avaient bégayé ou non. Les comparaisons des avis des deux groupes révèlent une concordance Kappa de Cohen de 0,276 (largement supérieure au niveau 0,01). Une analyse des résultats indique que les auditeurs et les locuteurs s'entendent largement sur les mots qui n'ont pas été bégayés (selon ce qu'ont dit les locuteurs), mais qu'ils s'entendent peu quant aux mots qui ont été bégayés (selon ceux qu'ont identifiés les locuteurs). |
| Record ID | 38 |
| Link | https://cjslpa.ca/files/2001_JSLPA_Vol_25/No_01_1-40/Tenowski_Schagen_JSLPA_2001.pdf |
CJSLPA is an open access journal which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose.
CJSLPA does not charge authors publication or processing fees.
Copyright of the Canadian Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology is held by Speech-Language and Audiology Canada (SAC). Appropriate credit must be given (SAC, publication name, article title, volume number, issue number and page number[s]) but not in any way that suggests SAC endorses you or your use of the work. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
Read